From the woman who warned that physical fitness could make you a right-wing extremist comes a whole new level of insanity — hordes of neo-Nazis are waiting at the gates to rape white women and kill black children thanks to the conservative justices on the Supreme Court.
The conspiracy theory is — perhaps unsurprisingly — based on a mingling of real-life stories and ideas that could only come from a college professor.
MSNBC columnist Cynthia Miller-Idriss recently warned in a column titled, “How the loss of Roe directly serves white supremacists’ horrifying plot,” that one of the primary results of Roe v. Wade being overturned won’t be millions of new babies being born each year, but a terrifying nightmare scenario where violent racists, emboldened by the words of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, rape women to further the white race.
The American University professor starts by recounting the recent indictment of Matthew Belanger, an alleged white supremacist and member of the extremist group Rapekrieg. Belanger is accused of drafting serious plans to brutally assault and kill minorities while raping white women in order to further the white race. The allegations are shocking, and if true, Belanger is clearly deranged.
Miller-Idriss then cites a whole host of unsavory characters and racists from the past and the present who also desire to eliminate minorities and create more white babies.
What she never mentioned was that Belanger was raided by the FBI in October 2020 and reportedly began hatching his mass rape plan in 2019 — almost three years prior to Roe being overturned.
Nonetheless, she implies throughout the piece that these bigots are encouraged by the loss of Roe due to two citations from Alito.
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health — the case that overturned Roe — Alito cited a claim from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that mentioned the “domestic supply of infants.” That phrase was referring to the fact that there are more adults wanting to adopt children than there are American-born babies available for adoption. It has nothing to do with race.
He also cited Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s observation that there are now more options for women with unwanted pregnancies to choose life, thus helping to alleviate hardship and eliminate the need to kill the child in the womb.
With those two claims, Miller-Idriss opines, “These kinds of justifications for dismantling reproductive rights reduce women to vessels charged with producing babies for the good of the collective.”
Thus, Miller-Idriss wants you to believe that neo-Nazis will now assault women who they view as “vessels” to increase the white population.
“It’s not a stretch to see how this frame benefits white supremacist extremists, their obsession with demographic change and their desire to increase white birth rates,” she said.
She never really explains how it benefits such extremists, other than to say that groups and individuals — who she admits are fringe — have discussed similar ideas in the past.
Buried deep in her article is a sentence that gives the game away and shows she is not a serious person or thinker.
“The loss of Roe v. Wade, in this scenario, directly serves white supremacist extremist goals — as long as it is white babies who cannot be aborted,” Miller-Idriss observed.
Yet, nowhere in America is abortion banned only for white babies. Nowhere is that being proposed or considered.
In fact, the data show that under Roe, black and brown babies were being killed at far higher rates than their white counterparts.
According to ABC News, 2019 CDC data revealed that “Black women had the highest rate of abortions with 23.8 abortions per 1,000 women,” while Hispanic women had 11.7 abortions per 1,000 women and white women had the lowest rate of 6.6 abortions per 1,000 women.
Even a basic understanding of mathematics reveals that, in all likelihood, the result of abortion being sent back to the states will mean that more minority babies are born — and thank God for that.
Leftists have also claimed that minorities will be “hurt” by abortion bans because, unlike their wealthy white counterparts, they will not be able to afford to travel for abortions and will have to carry the baby.
In other words, what actually “directly” served white supremacists and their ghastly goals of mass murdering non-white children was the recognition of abortion as a right at the federal level — meaning pre-Dobbs and during Roe.
As one pro-life activist from Ohio claimed in 2019, “Today there is no greater threat to the personhood of people of color than legalized abortion. I cannot think of another political cause that has done more to choke off the dreams, votes and futures of black Ohioans than the pro-abortion movement.”
Yet Miller-Idriss asserted that, “Groups like Rapekrieg are fringe extremists whose violent plots clearly constitute terrorist action. But in a post-Roe world, a plot to force women to become pregnant, however fringe it might be, takes on a whole new meaning.”
Miller-Idriss’ flawed thinking might fly on a college campus where she can spout her views unchallenged in front of naive 20-year-olds. But it would be wise for her to listen to her own advice on conspiracy-prone individuals.
In 2021, Miller-Idriss explained to Teen Vogue that conspiracy theories abound because when “people feel out of control, they’re attracted to things that offer them an action path.”
“It’s easier to believe in some nefarious orchestration than to believe that there is an invisible virus in the air that could harm their family,” she claimed about COVID disinformation.
She was as right then as she is wrong now.
The views expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Source: Dailywire
